Adjective:

दुःखद,

patentable's Usage Examples:

Convention (EPC) is the extent to which subject matter in these fields is patentable under the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of October 5, 1973.

is a requirement for a patent claim to be patentable.

stated that other jurisdictions with comparable legislation including the United States, Europe, Japan and New Zealand, among others, have held the oncomouse to be patentable.

In a 5-4 split, the Supreme Court held that the oncomouse and higher life forms in general are not patentable subject matter in Canada.

More generally, the court is of the opinion that allowing patents on higher life forms would involve a radical departure from the traditional patent regime and it is for to Parliament to determine whether higher life forms are patentable.

patent law at that time, living things were generally understood to not be patentable subject matter under Section 101 of Title 35 U.

eligible for patent protection if they pass the tests of patentability: patentable subject matter, novelty, inventive step or non-obviousness, and industrial.

that a process claim directed to a numerical algorithm, as such, was not patentable because "the patent would wholly pre-empt the mathematical formula and.

In Canadian patent law, only “inventions” are patentable.

the abstract investment strategy set forth in the application was not patentable subject matter.

elements are combined in a way such that they do not interact in a novel, unobvious way, then the resulting combination is obvious and therefore unpatentable.

that merely isolating genes that are found in nature does not make them patentable.