वेस्ट्रीज़ इसके अंग्रेजी अर्थ का उदाहरण

Prior to the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 the administration of the English Poor Laws was the responsibility of the vestries of individual parishes, which varied widely in their size, populations, financial resources, rateable values and requirements.

The parish council was to assume all powers exercised by parish vestries except those dealing with the church or ecclesiastical charities.

The parish as a result of the disestablishment of the vestries became of two legal types and areas: religious and civil.

In Gibraltar the money raised was used for the construction of new vestries and the creation of a second chapel in the south aisle of the cathedral, to be dedicated to Saint George and in memory of all who lost their lives in the Mediterranean area during the war.

Some of the large towns had by local Acts got lighting and other matters under vestries in the parishes, and all those Acts were founded upon the idea of extending the vestry system to the management of towns; but the vestries never made the way in Ireland which they did in England, because there was no poor law.

The basis of vestries being so popular in England, being on account of the poor law administration.

There was no poor law in Ireland until 1838, and the vestries had no real basis to rest on; and in 1828 they were in a most unpopular position, because the agitation which overthrew them in 1833 by the extinction of what is called parish cess, the same as the church rates in England, was just at its height.

The precursor administrative areas were parishes run by vestries, which gradually ceded power after 1895:.

The Act divided the County of London into 28 metropolitan boroughs, replacing the 41 parish vestries and District Boards of Works administering the area.

While an elected London County Council had been created by the Local Government Act 1888, the lower tier of local government still consisted of elective vestries and District boards of works created in 1855 by the Metropolis Management Act.

In its report in 1894, the Commission recommended increasing the power of the County Council over the vestries and boards, with county councillors becoming ex officio members of the lower authorities, and the LCC gaining powers to frame by-laws to govern them.

In reaction to the report, the vestries sought a strengthening of the second tier of government in the capital.

The common seals of nineteen vestries were affixed to the document.