मुद्दई हिंदी उपयोग और उदाहरण

न्यायिक पारिभाषिकी न्यायशास्त्र में अभियोगी या मुद्दई (plaintiff) वह पक्ष (व्यक्ति या दल) होता है जो न्यायालय में मुकदमा लाकर किसी पर आरोप लगाता है।

इसके विपरीत अभियोगी या मुद्दई (plaintiff) वह पक्ष होता है जो मुकदमा लाकर किसी पर आरोप लगाता है।

"" न्यायिक दृष्टि से पक्ष इन प्रकार के हो सकते हैं: अभियोगी या मुद्दई (plaintiff, जो न्यायालय में मुकदमा लाकर किसी पर आरोप लगाता है), अभियुक्त (defendant, जिसपर आरोप लगता हौ और जिसे बचाव पक्ष भी कहा जाता है), याचिकाकर्ता (petitioner, जो न्यायालय से निर्णय या आदेश जारी करने की प्रार्थना करता है), प्रतिवादी (respondent, जो याचिका का विरोध करता है)।

मुद्दई इसके अंग्रेजी अर्थ का उदाहरण

In March, 2006 the court granted the school's motion to dismiss the suit on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they suffered any restriction of their freedom of speech or religion and that Caldwell's exposure to the Web page was too minimal to cause the type of injury that would make her eligible to sue.

local civilian witnesses for the plaintiff were intimidated so they refused to testify against Smith,.

The case was then taken to the Virginia Supreme Court who, in January 2005, decided in favor of the plaintiffs, the result being that no mining at the site in question was permitted to go forward.

The plaintiffs were lessees of Thomas Johnson's descendants, who had inherited the land.

The plaintiffs brought an action for ejectment against M'Intosh in the United States District Court for the District of Illinois, contending that their chain of title was superior by virtue of Johnson's purchases.

The plaintiffs, Eulala and Russel Shute, were passengers on a cruise ship operated by the defendant, Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.

The plaintiffs boarded the cruise ship in California, and one was injured in international waters off the coast of Mexico.

The plaintiffs then filed a lawsuit in Washington, in violation of the contract clause.

The hardship on the plaintiffs mattered little, as they had bought the ticket, and no one forced them to go on a cruise.

On June 13, 2007, lawyers for borrowers seeking class status asserted in a filing with the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois that "assets of the Ameriquest entities were [asset|transferred] to Arnall with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud the plaintiffs in this action.

Where a defendant in a civil proceeding is entitled to have interested persons joined as parties (added to the list of plaintiffs or defendants in the case), and it is shown at the trial that those persons have not been included in the petition, he is entitled to a postponement of the trial until they can be joined.

As a condition to granting a continuance, a court may require a plaintiff to a file a bond securing a payment of all court costs incurred.

Judge Kimberly Mueller ruled that Kentucky and the other states lacked legal standing to sue on behalf of their residents and that the plaintiffs were representing solely the interests of egg farmers, not "a substantial statement of their populations.