द्वैधीकरण इसके अंग्रेजी अर्थ का उदाहरण

This stands off to the north, forming the dividing wall between the two valleys.

The Keith line was a line drawn through the Province of New Jersey, dividing it into the Province of West Jersey and the Province of East Jersey.

The refractive index of a medium is calculated by dividing the speed of light in a vacuum by the speed of light in that medium.

Nationalists also perceived Britain's southern policy as artificially dividing Sudan and preventing its unification under an arabized and Islamic ruling class.

It is calculated by dividing those premiums allocated for fully insured or self-funded health care coverage into the total expenses for inpatient, professional (physicians and other licensed providers), outpatient, and pharmacy.

The river dividing around islands was easy to ford.

, the number of purple/grey curves that are intersected by the blue circle) is therefore determined by dividing the radius of the blue circle, u_0, by the range of each solution \pi/2 and using the floor or ceiling functions:.

An elevated mitotic index indicates more cells are dividing.

Former states and territories of India The Purchase Line is the name commonly given to the line dividing Indian from British Colonial lands established in the Treaty of Fort Stanwix of 1768 in western Pennsylvania.

In this opera the composer makes his first attempt at writing each act in the score without dividing into separate numbers or scenes (perhaps in emulation of Richard Wagner's music dramas).

The split began with Joliet's freshman football team dividing.

It has been conjectured that if p is a prime dividing k-\lambda and not dividing v, then the group automorphism defined by g\mapsto g^p fixes some translate of D (this is equivalent to being a multiplier).

द्वैधीकरण हिंदी उपयोग और उदाहरण

"" इस तरह वास्तव में श्री अरविंद में दो प्रकार के तर्क का ऐसा द्वैधीकरण है कि अन्ततः उनके दर्शन में मायावाद अनावृत ही रह जाता है।

द्वैधीकरण इसके अंग्रेजी अर्थ का उदाहरण

Atomic, molecular, and optical physics In macroeconomics, the classical dichotomy is the idea, attributed to classical and pre-Keynesian economics, that real and nominal variables can be analyzed separately.

To be precise, an economy exhibits the classical dichotomy if real variables such as output and real interest rates can be completely analyzed without considering what is happening to their nominal counterparts, the money value of output and the interest rate.

An economy exhibits the classical dichotomy if money is neutral, affecting only the price level, not real variables.

As such, if the classical dichotomy holds, money only affects absolute rather than the relative prices between goods.

The classical dichotomy was integral to the thinking of some pre-Keynesian economists ("money as a veil") as a long-run proposition and is found today in new classical theories of macroeconomics.

In the strict sense, money is not neutral in the short-run, that is, classical dichotomy does not hold, since agents tend to respond to changes in prices and in the quantity of money through changing their supply decisions.

However, money should be neutral in the long run, and the classical dichotomy should be restored in the long-run, since there was no relationship between prices and real macroeconomic performance at the data level.

Keynesians and monetarists reject the classical dichotomy, because they argue that prices are sticky.

Post-Keynesians reject the classic dichotomy as well, for different reasons, emphasizing the role of banks in creating money, as in monetary circuit theory.

On the simplest level, the painting can be interpreted as depicting a dichotomy: the redemptive power of Christ, as symbolised by the purity and symmetry of the top half of the painting; contrasted with the flaws of Man, as symbolised by the dark, chaotic scenes in the bottom half of the painting.

According to Shōshin Kuwayama there was a clear dichotomy between worshipers of the Hindu god Surya and followers of Zhun.

Similarly, McCarthy argues that the separation of foreign intelligence and criminal investigation is a false dichotomy, in that "the existence of a crime or national security threat is an objective reality, entirely independent of the investigators' subjective mindsets about why they are investigating".