जूरी-प्रणाली इसके अंग्रेजी अर्थ का उदाहरण

He made significant administrative changes, called for the merit selection of judges, implemented streamlined procedures, reduced opportunities for "judge shopping," and reformed the state's grand jury system.

Some in the common law countries argue that this is to do with the elimination of the jury system in 1943; however, trials by jury were rarely held as the accused had to give up the right to appeal.

Lobbying by human rights groups and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations resulted in the passing of a judicial reform bill in May 2004, which introduced a lay-judge system in 2009, which is often confused with the jury system in common law countries.

Another possibility is that, given that the non-jury system under the inquisition system has a predictable ruling on guilt, Japan's understaffed prosecutors working on low budgets only bring the most obviously guilty defendants to trial, and do not file indictments in cases in which they are not certain they can win.

Some complex trials took years or even a decade to conclude, which is impossible under a jury system.

The jury system had made a sporadic appearance in England from time to time, including, but not limited to Danelaw and the Saxons.

Over the course of a generation or so after 1215, the jury system began to be rationalized and regarded as a judicial body.

The Mirror of Justices contains a violent attack on the jury system from 1290.

In those parts of France where the jury system took root at the same time, there were tremendous protests against it, as being oppressive.

The problem of maintenance and other corruptions of the jury system.

Shortly after the institution of the jury system, with its attendant seeking of evidence, based on testimony given by witnesses, the problem of maintenance developed.

Sir Thomas Smith commented that the jury system in the time of Elizabeth could not exist without the ability to compel testimony using the writ subpoena.

The work of AJS focuses primarily on judicial diversity, judicial ethics, judicial selection, access to justice, criminal justice reform, and the jury system.

He has been described as "one of the most vigorous and vociferous believers in the impeccability of the English jury system of this or any other century".