अंशदायी-लापरवाही इसके अंग्रेजी अर्थ का उदाहरण

As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.

Instead the conduct amounted to contributory negligence, which is not a complete defence.

This rule is called contributory negligence, a doctrine perceived to be overly "harsh", which "has caused all but a few States to substitute the doctrine of comparative negligence".

Fifteen states follow this approach (10 contributory responsibility, five which still follow contributory negligence.

2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

The doctrine of contributory negligence in California law at the time would have prevented any recovery to Li.

The California Supreme Court, aware of the recent trend toward comparative rather than contributory negligence, took the opportunity to reconsider the state's tort law on the subject.

The only unique feature of the case was its reasoning on Section 1714 of the Civil Code, which had been thought to codify the "all-or-nothing" approach to contributory negligence:.